Currently the erlite install shows Model as EBNT_E100, uses eth0 as lan, eth1 as wan, and doesn't use eth2. - define dts for this device, such that we get a cleaner naming here - fix handing of this device to inlude eth2 - change eth0 to wan, like er-4/usg/etc as it once was intended Fixes: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/14946 Signed-off-by: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> Link: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/17758 Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
47 lines
964 B
Text
47 lines
964 B
Text
do_sysinfo_octeon() {
|
|
local machine
|
|
local name
|
|
|
|
machine=$(grep "^system type" /proc/cpuinfo | sed "s/system type.*: \(.*\)/\1/g")
|
|
of_machine=$(head -n1 /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/compatible)
|
|
|
|
# Sadly for whatever reason the N821 (Cisco Viptela vEdge 1000) uses the
|
|
# same supposedly unique board ID as the EdgeRouter. This is bad, so
|
|
# we override what cpuinfo gives us using the device tree as a hint.
|
|
case "$of_machine" in
|
|
"cisco,vedge1000"*)
|
|
return 0
|
|
esac
|
|
|
|
case "$machine" in
|
|
"UBNT_E100"*|\
|
|
"UBNT_E300"*|\
|
|
"UBNT_USG"*)
|
|
# let generic 02_sysinfo handle it since device has its own device tree
|
|
return 0
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
"UBNT_E200"*)
|
|
name="er"
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
"UBNT_E220"*)
|
|
name="erpro"
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
"ITUS_SHIELD"*)
|
|
name="itus,shield-router"
|
|
;;
|
|
|
|
*)
|
|
name="generic"
|
|
;;
|
|
esac
|
|
|
|
[ -e "/tmp/sysinfo/" ] || mkdir -p "/tmp/sysinfo/"
|
|
|
|
echo "$name" > /tmp/sysinfo/board_name
|
|
echo "$machine" > /tmp/sysinfo/model
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
boot_hook_add preinit_main do_sysinfo_octeon
|