difos/target/linux/bcm27xx/patches-6.12/950-0519-numa-emulation-Check-emulated-zones-around-the-CMA-w.patch
Álvaro Fernández Rojas 8f9e91ad03 bcm27xx: add 6.12 patches from RPi repo
These patches were generated from:
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commits/rpi-6.12.y
With the following command:
git format-patch -N v6.12.27..HEAD
(HEAD -> 8d3206ee456a5ecdf9ddbfd8e5e231e4f0cd716e)

Exceptions:
- (def)configs patches
- github workflows patches
- applied & reverted patches
- readme patches
- wireless patches

Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@gmail.com>
2025-05-21 11:32:18 +02:00

107 lines
2.8 KiB
Diff

From 92719518d6336db632a00bcfb2ec28a8f82998a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 16:53:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] numa/emulation: Check emulated zones around the CMA window
... Make sure CMA zones do not straddle the emulated NUMA nodes ...
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
---
include/linux/cma.h | 6 ++++++
mm/cma.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/numa_emulation.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
--- a/include/linux/cma.h
+++ b/include/linux/cma.h
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ extern void cma_reserve_pages_on_error(s
#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
struct folio *cma_alloc_folio(struct cma *cma, int order, gfp_t gfp);
bool cma_free_folio(struct cma *cma, const struct folio *folio);
+int cma_check_range(u64 *start, u64 *end);
#else
static inline struct folio *cma_alloc_folio(struct cma *cma, int order, gfp_t gfp)
{
@@ -66,6 +67,11 @@ static inline bool cma_free_folio(struct
{
return false;
}
+
+static inline int cma_check_range(u64 *start, u64 *end)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
#endif
#endif
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -602,3 +602,39 @@ int cma_for_each_area(int (*it)(struct c
return 0;
}
+
+struct cma_check_range_data {
+ u64 start, end;
+};
+
+static int check_range(struct cma *cma_, void *data)
+{
+ struct cma_check_range_data *range = data;
+ struct cma_check_range_data cma;
+ bool starts_in_range;
+ bool ends_in_range;
+
+ cma.start = cma_get_base(cma_);
+ cma.end = cma.start + cma_get_size(cma_) - 1;
+
+ starts_in_range = cma.start >= range->start && cma.start <= range->end;
+ ends_in_range = cma.end >= range->start && cma.end <= range->end;
+
+ if (starts_in_range == ends_in_range)
+ return 0;
+
+ pr_notice("CMA %s [%llx-%llx] straddles range [%llx-%llx]\n",
+ cma_->name, cma.start, cma.end, range->start, range->end);
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+
+int cma_check_range(u64 *start, u64 *end)
+{
+ struct cma_check_range_data range = {
+ .start = *start,
+ .end = *end,
+ };
+
+ return cma_for_each_area(check_range, &range);
+}
--- a/mm/numa_emulation.c
+++ b/mm/numa_emulation.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <linux/topology.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/numa_memblks.h>
+#include <linux/cma.h>
#include <asm/numa.h>
#define FAKE_NODE_MIN_SIZE ((u64)32 << 20)
@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ static int __init emu_setup_memblk(struc
{
struct numa_memblk *eb = &ei->blk[ei->nr_blks];
struct numa_memblk *pb = &pi->blk[phys_blk];
+ int ret;
if (ei->nr_blks >= NR_NODE_MEMBLKS) {
pr_err("NUMA: Too many emulated memblks, failing emulation\n");
@@ -62,6 +64,10 @@ static int __init emu_setup_memblk(struc
eb->end = pb->start + size;
eb->nid = nid;
+ ret = cma_check_range(&eb->start, &eb->end);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
if (emu_nid_to_phys[nid] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
emu_nid_to_phys[nid] = pb->nid;