2021-03-02 08:24:45 +00:00
|
|
|
From 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
kernel: 5.4: import wireguard backport
Rather than using the clunky, old, slower wireguard-linux-compat out of
tree module, this commit does a patch-by-patch backport of upstream's
wireguard to 5.4. This specific backport is in widespread use, being
part of SUSE's enterprise kernel, Oracle's enterprise kernel, Google's
Android kernel, Gentoo's distro kernel, and probably more I've forgotten
about. It's definately the "more proper" way of adding wireguard to a
kernel than the ugly compat.h hell of the wireguard-linux-compat repo.
And most importantly for OpenWRT, it allows using the same module
configuration code for 5.10 as for 5.4, with no need for bifurcation.
These patches are from the backport tree which is maintained in the
open here: https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/log/?h=backport-5.4.y
I'll be sending PRs to update this as needed.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
2021-02-19 13:29:04 +00:00
|
|
|
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
|
|
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:06:20 -0600
|
2021-03-02 08:24:45 +00:00
|
|
|
Subject: [PATCH] wireguard: implement header_ops->parse_protocol for AF_PACKET
|
kernel: 5.4: import wireguard backport
Rather than using the clunky, old, slower wireguard-linux-compat out of
tree module, this commit does a patch-by-patch backport of upstream's
wireguard to 5.4. This specific backport is in widespread use, being
part of SUSE's enterprise kernel, Oracle's enterprise kernel, Google's
Android kernel, Gentoo's distro kernel, and probably more I've forgotten
about. It's definately the "more proper" way of adding wireguard to a
kernel than the ugly compat.h hell of the wireguard-linux-compat repo.
And most importantly for OpenWRT, it allows using the same module
configuration code for 5.10 as for 5.4, with no need for bifurcation.
These patches are from the backport tree which is maintained in the
open here: https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux/log/?h=backport-5.4.y
I'll be sending PRs to update this as needed.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
2021-02-19 13:29:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commit 01a4967c71c004f8ecad4ab57021348636502fa9 upstream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WireGuard uses skb->protocol to determine packet type, and bails out if
|
|
|
|
it's not set or set to something it's not expecting. For AF_PACKET
|
|
|
|
injection, we need to support its call chain of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
packet_sendmsg -> packet_snd -> packet_parse_headers ->
|
|
|
|
dev_parse_header_protocol -> parse_protocol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without a valid parse_protocol, this returns zero, and wireguard then
|
|
|
|
rejects the skb. So, this wires up the ip_tunnel handler for layer 3
|
|
|
|
packets for that case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported-by: Hans Wippel <ndev@hwipl.net>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
drivers/net/wireguard/device.c | 1 +
|
|
|
|
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c
|
|
|
|
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c
|
|
|
|
@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ static void wg_setup(struct net_device *
|
|
|
|
max(sizeof(struct ipv6hdr), sizeof(struct iphdr));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dev->netdev_ops = &netdev_ops;
|
|
|
|
+ dev->header_ops = &ip_tunnel_header_ops;
|
|
|
|
dev->hard_header_len = 0;
|
|
|
|
dev->addr_len = 0;
|
|
|
|
dev->needed_headroom = DATA_PACKET_HEAD_ROOM;
|